Posted by: charhoehn@gmail.com | June 17, 2009

Favors are overrated

This is an important lesson I learned the hard way.  It’s common sense advice that you don’t really think about until you’ve screwed things up, so hopefully this post will save someone from an awkward/painful situation in the future.

Last year, when I was still in school, I was dating a girl who wanted to go into advertising after graduation.  In spite of my warnings that traditional advertising was in decline and wasn’t a good long-term choice, she insisted that she still wanted to pursue it.  Because I was good friends with a bunch of people in that industry from the internship I did, I said I’d put in a good word for her.

Now, this girl was not dumb (in the academic sense).  She had a really high GPA, flawless record, and was a genuinely sweet person.  But I knew from the time I’d spent with her that she wasn’t all that sharp.  She didn’t grasp basic concepts easily, she actually had to bust her ass to get that high GPA, and worst of all, she was shy and afraid to ask questions.  Even though I was aware of all this, I told my old boss that she was legit and passed her resume on.

She got the internship, of course.  And when I talked to my boss a few months later, she suggested that I either not recommend people in the future or develop a stronger filter.

It was stupid on my part, because I really valued the relationship I had with my boss.  The recommendation I gave reflected poorly on me, and her trust in me was shaken.  It just wasn’t worth it.  Favors are overrated.

I’ve learned my lesson since then.  I don’t say anyone is legit anymore unless I’m 100% confident and have witnessed their work ethic/talent/creativity/passion firsthand.

If your recommendation has the potential to really screw somebody over (in time and/or money wasted), you can’t take the situation lightly.  You need to carefully balance the person’s track record with your gut feeling.  I knew this girl had a good track record, but my gut was telling me the situation was going to be a disaster.

If you really want to maintain a person’s trust and respect, do them a favor and be coompletely transparent.  Don’t do anyone a favor just because they’re your friend.  If you absolutely have to make a recommendation, give that person a few options.  Say, “I recommend Person A, B, and C.  They’re all good, but I think you should pick whoever suits your needs best.”  It’s an easy way to do damage control.  When they have options, it’s their fault if they make the wrong choice, not yours.

Posted by: charhoehn@gmail.com | June 11, 2009

The Hangover vs. IHTSBIH

I saw ‘The Hangover’ today, after hearing multiple rave reviews from friends over the weekend.  Everyone said it was amazing, and I even heard a few supposedly hyperbolical “Funniest movie I’ve ever seen” statements.

Because it’s so close to ‘I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell‘ in terms of audience and subject matter, I thought I’d write down a few thoughts on the two movies.  [Quick warning: This post contains a couple minor spoilers for 'The Hangover.']

  • It seems like the writers took on this mindset when putting the screenplay together: “Let’s think of a bunch of really crazy situations that cool people would probably get into if they spent a month blacked out in Vegas, then we’ll compile it all into a 12-hour time slot.  They’ll find a baby, a tiger, and a live chicken in their hotel room, steal a cop car, lose a tooth, marry an escort… AND THEY WON’T REMEMBER ANY OF IT!  Oh my god, these guys will be so crazy and hilarious!!!”  Almost all of these situations seem cliche and, to a large extent, predictable.  But if you think situational humor is the greatest thing on earth, then you’ll probably love this movie.  You’ll probably love this next sentence, too: Picture a guy waking up naked in a cornfield with a shoe… on his hand!  Hilarious, right?  I’m cracking up just thinking about it!
  • I love Zach Galifianakis — he’s one of my favorite comedians — and I thought he was the only truly enjoyable character.  I’d even say he carried this movie, and produced 80% of the biggest laughs from the audience.  After following Zach’s career for 6+ years, seeing him live, and owning two of his live performance DVDs, I’m thrilled to see that he has successfully broken into the mainstream and people are digging his style.  [SPOILER] The part where he reads his speech on the roof is the funniest scene… and it happens in the first 30 minutes.  All downhill from there.
  • [SPOILER] What was with The Rainman sequence?  It seemed like it was slapped into the script as a half-hearted attempt to make other plot points cohesive with the story.  From a stylistic standpoint it was pretty cool, but overall it was just weird and mostly unnecessary.
  • [SPOILER] They stole a tiger… from Mike Tyson… while they were completely blacked out… and managed to sneak it into Caesar’s Palace… a Las Vegas high-security casino… UNDETECTED.  That’s the equivalent of getting through airport security with an AK47 duct taped to your face.
  • [SPOILER] The groom was on the roof for two days… and he was still passed out when they found him?  What?

Now that I’m able to make a direct comparison of Tucker’s movie with one that’s kinda similar, making a ton of money, and getting rave reviews, I’m even more excited.  We’re working with a film that’s, no exaggeration, at least 10x funnier.  It truly makes me sad to hear people say this was one of the funniest movies they’ve ever seen, because that means their standards are in the gutter.  Comedies these days just aren’t that great.  ‘The Hangover,’ relative to many modern comedies, is actually pretty solid.  But look at the slop it gets to compete with — all lowest common denominator drivel.

Now, you might be thinking I’m just being harsh because I had high expectations going into it.  Not true.  I’ve gone into movies before with tons of hype, always skeptical and worried that people building them up will ultimately lead to my disappointment, yet I’ll still come out more than happy.  Like with ‘The Dark Knight,’ ‘Wall-E,’ or ‘Slumdog Millionaire,’ for instance.  Everyone was saying those were brilliant, and they were right — no amount of exaggerated claims would have resulted in me walking out of the theater feeling let down.  But ‘The Hangover’?  Come on.  It’s okay, but if it’s the funniest movie you’ve ever seen, then I just feel sorry for you.

Tucker’s movie has a similar storyline, generally speaking, but it has several things ‘The Hangover’ doesn’t have.  A really good story, actual depth to its characters, an endless stream of funny lines (in addition to funny situations), no ridiculous plot points, and heart.  It’s a solid A-grade movie, no B.S.

I give ‘The Hangover’ a C.  Maybe my standards are too high, I don’t know.  But I do know that I’m excited to watch the nation’s response to ‘I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell’ in a few months.  Like I’ve said before, it’s going to be BIG.

Posted by: charhoehn@gmail.com | June 6, 2009

Follow me (in a non-creepy way)

I always thought the “be sure to subscribe to my RSS feed” posts were kinda pointless.  Who doesn’t know this stuff by now, right?  Well, apparently a lot of people either don’t know or they just don’t do it.  I swear, I had someone write to me recently saying he preferred dropping in on my site periodically instead of subscribing because he liked looking at the cows picture.  I really need to change that, by the way.  It’s not drawing in the ladies the way I thought it would.

So if you aren’t already, you can subscribe to me and receive my posts in your email inbox (click here) or RSS reader (click here).

You can also follow me on Twitter (where I don’t take myself so seriously), and Delicious (where I frequently save interesting articles and websites I come across).

Posted by: charhoehn@gmail.com | June 5, 2009

Unquestioned assumptions

Our society does not value critical thinking and skepticism highly, but rather steadfast faith and decisions based on emotion.

I think I was about 15 years old when I first realized that most adults, generally speaking, don’t really know what they’re talking about.  This is not to imply that I know and they don’t — far from it.  If anything, I’m on the same page knowledge-wise.  Where many of them go wrong, however, is when they preach on important topics with the posture of a seasoned expert.  They spout superficial knowledge, heavily influencing impressionable young people who don’t know any better.  That “knowledge” is sealed into these young people’s minds, and it lingers there, unquestioned.  Then the cycle repeats itself because no one had the energy to doubt.

We have all been guilty of both preaching and not questioning, I think.  We preach because it’s difficult to be humble or we want to be accepted and admired for our knowledge.  We don’t question because it’s mentally challenging or emotionally exhausting to even confront the flaws in our conventional wisdom to begin with.  But really, how many false truths have been discreetly pounded into our brain through family or friends or school or media or society?  How many of our assumptions would we realize are completely backwards if we could just step out of our egocentric comfort zones?  And I’m not talking conspiracy theories here — I’m talking about our complete disregard for a healthy amount of skepticism before accepting something as fact.

These assumptions we’re questioning don’t even have to be big things.  It could be something as small as suspecting that shaving cream could be the culprit for your face’s vulnerability to getting cut.  Or that the shoes your doctor recommended to heal your back pain might actually be making things worse.   [And I'm not linking to these articles because they contain irrefutable facts; I'm linking to them because they make good arguments against conventional wisdom.]

Of course, certain assumptions can be life-altering when questioned.  You could find out that your trusty, rational brain takes a backseat to both your genes and your hormones more often than you ever thought possible.  Or you might discover that many religions are intricate metaphors that are heavily rooted in sun worship.

My perception of truth has been shattered so many times over the years that I’ve been able to build up a fairly thick skin when I encounter a big worldview shift.  One of these shifts happened within the last year, when I slowly came to realize that almost all conventional wisdom about finding a career path is largely flawed (if you couldn’t tell by the nature of many of my posts).

What I constantly wonder about, though, are my personal assumptions that have still been left unquestioned.  What am I missing?  And what truths have I only scratched the surface on?

What truths have you questioned, and consequently uprooted?

Posted by: charhoehn@gmail.com | June 1, 2009

Who makes your decisions?

Looking back on big decisions you’ve made in the past (where you went to school, what you studied, who you got into relationships with, where you lived, where you worked, etc.), how did you ultimately end up with those particular choices?

Most people will do some psychological acrobatics to shrug off sub-par decisions.  “It’s what made me happy,” or “It seemed like my only option at the time.”  But the reality is that there was usually a friend, or a girlfriend, or a family member that was the true determinant of the situation.  And to prevent a little unhappiness in the present, they made a bad choice that would cause a lot of unhappiness in the future.  The sad thing is that this pattern feeds on itself.  Once you get used to making decisions for your life on other people’s terms, it becomes really hard to stop.

How many people avoid good decisions simply because they don’t want to feel uncomfortable?  How many people go through life hoping to limit the number of times they felt embarrassed?  Do you really want to live with the harsh reality that every big decision you made was weighted against whether other people would judge you or not?

I know I’ve made decisions, big decisions, in the past where I was trying to please someone else or avoid a minor confrontation.  I don’t regret where I ended up; I just regret not embracing the temporary discomfort.  Because when you embrace it once, you start to get used to it.  And when you get used to it, you can do it again.  And again.

Until finally, you’re making decisions based on what you want.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories